Monday 27 May 2013
Thursday 9 May 2013
A Clockwork Orange:
Just wondering who else likes this book? I read the European version. It has an extra chapter.
Censorship is a tough subject and this book and subsequent movie have brought up interesting concerns following a crime spree in Great Britain resulting from the movie release.
I will make a video about the whole thing next week and post it here I think. There is just too much to talk about for a simple blog. :)
What do you like about the characters and do you think there are redeeming characteristics to them?
The work is also societally influential, especially for youth, in the way of, fashion, music, etc.
Just wondering who else likes this book? I read the European version. It has an extra chapter.
Censorship is a tough subject and this book and subsequent movie have brought up interesting concerns following a crime spree in Great Britain resulting from the movie release.
I will make a video about the whole thing next week and post it here I think. There is just too much to talk about for a simple blog. :)
What do you like about the characters and do you think there are redeeming characteristics to them?
The work is also societally influential, especially for youth, in the way of, fashion, music, etc.
Friday 19 April 2013
Fathers rights group through AVFM
So woolybumblebee fumbled again, and this time is deleting comments that are critical of a video she put up called "Zach Rosenberg - a disgusting parent."
Wolybumblebee says in the comment sections of the video she has downloaded all the video's of Zach and
his son and is saying he called his son a rapist, which she didn't link any evidence of.
woolybumblebee tells us that the child will be damaged. She then plays a clip of the father
joking that his son should retrieve a laptop from the dumpster. Later it was added that Zach
also fed his son salsa once.
While reading, watching and listening to this I was like, "So?!" I couldn't understand why she was
picking on some random MRA man. I messaged Woolybumblebee about this twice. I asked her if
this was a joke. She has never commented back although I got a comment back from Girlwrites......what
that her channel wasn't a dating website. GWW also thinks I'm stalking her specifically.
Apparently a 20 something girl is desperate for the romantic affections of an angry misogynist,
that talks about how she's almost a guy all the time, and lives off the kindness of men.
That'll be the day.
It seems it is not a joke. The father rights advocacy group that operates through AVFM actually
went out of their way to create a case about a father. Not that I'm saying that humor is defensible,
and hot sauce is not beyond reasonable, because that's a matter of personal opinion. I do however
see inconsistency in AVFM.
In the case of Zach, AVFM fails to protect a fathers right to father his child, rather threatening to
take his child from him.
This is being presented to the court of public appeal, because it would be thrown out of the
court of law.
I suspect the father must be some kind of political opponent of AVFM and Co. because I
don't believe that, even a phony father rights advocacy group, (like this one) would so willingly
do something like this.
AVFM has an advocacy part of their site a section called "Judicial Accountability Committee."
This section states, in regard to what they do: "We strongly encourage you to have legal representation, but we do not work under your attorney’s direction, and often we take courses of action that your attorney would not advise you to take. Our work mainly consists of attempts to bring public pressure on the state functionaries and others involved in your case, which many attorneys do not like." (emphasis added by me)
The section later tells us that they deal with government misconduct and you should be aware: "Corrupt public officials, including police, prosecutors, judges and elected public servants do not usually appreciate being publicly challenged and/or exposed. They can and will act with vindictiveness toward you for the measures we take exposing their actions to the public." Sounds like they don't trust the police or the courts to begin with and they will encourage you to do things that will ultimately lead you to lose the case like hassle the police and judges.
" We will not publish anything until we review the information, speak with you regarding your understanding of the terms stated above and reach a mutual agreement to work on your behalf." AVFM publishes evidence in ongoing investigations... this has happened before and a gag order issued by the judge on AVFM... The evidence published in an ongoing investigation was an audio recording but didn't really let you hear anything but a man being prevented from entering a vehicle. There didn't seem to be even sounds of struggle, just children who wanted daddy in the car, so I found it strange to put this out to the general public.
This is the important part written in this section: "Above all, be honest with us. We are well aware that in many of life’s circumstances, especially those that involve marriage or other long term relationships that neither side is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes." meaning AVFM should have the applicants best interest in mind, and reserve judgement, but as you can see above it's all lies.
Just because Zac has a penis doesn't mean feminists will consider him guilty of child abuse. I need more proof than that. Preferably by qualified detective and our judicial system, not keyboard warriors on the internet.
I do not condone this type of harassment.
So much for representation. A voice for.... no, just no.
Wolybumblebee says in the comment sections of the video she has downloaded all the video's of Zach and
his son and is saying he called his son a rapist, which she didn't link any evidence of.
woolybumblebee tells us that the child will be damaged. She then plays a clip of the father
joking that his son should retrieve a laptop from the dumpster. Later it was added that Zach
also fed his son salsa once.
While reading, watching and listening to this I was like, "So?!" I couldn't understand why she was
picking on some random MRA man. I messaged Woolybumblebee about this twice. I asked her if
this was a joke. She has never commented back although I got a comment back from Girlwrites......what
that her channel wasn't a dating website. GWW also thinks I'm stalking her specifically.
Apparently a 20 something girl is desperate for the romantic affections of an angry misogynist,
that talks about how she's almost a guy all the time, and lives off the kindness of men.
That'll be the day.
It seems it is not a joke. The father rights advocacy group that operates through AVFM actually
went out of their way to create a case about a father. Not that I'm saying that humor is defensible,
and hot sauce is not beyond reasonable, because that's a matter of personal opinion. I do however
see inconsistency in AVFM.
In the case of Zach, AVFM fails to protect a fathers right to father his child, rather threatening to
take his child from him.
This is being presented to the court of public appeal, because it would be thrown out of the
court of law.
I suspect the father must be some kind of political opponent of AVFM and Co. because I
don't believe that, even a phony father rights advocacy group, (like this one) would so willingly
do something like this.
AVFM has an advocacy part of their site a section called "Judicial Accountability Committee."
This section states, in regard to what they do: "We strongly encourage you to have legal representation, but we do not work under your attorney’s direction, and often we take courses of action that your attorney would not advise you to take. Our work mainly consists of attempts to bring public pressure on the state functionaries and others involved in your case, which many attorneys do not like." (emphasis added by me)
The section later tells us that they deal with government misconduct and you should be aware: "Corrupt public officials, including police, prosecutors, judges and elected public servants do not usually appreciate being publicly challenged and/or exposed. They can and will act with vindictiveness toward you for the measures we take exposing their actions to the public." Sounds like they don't trust the police or the courts to begin with and they will encourage you to do things that will ultimately lead you to lose the case like hassle the police and judges.
" We will not publish anything until we review the information, speak with you regarding your understanding of the terms stated above and reach a mutual agreement to work on your behalf." AVFM publishes evidence in ongoing investigations... this has happened before and a gag order issued by the judge on AVFM... The evidence published in an ongoing investigation was an audio recording but didn't really let you hear anything but a man being prevented from entering a vehicle. There didn't seem to be even sounds of struggle, just children who wanted daddy in the car, so I found it strange to put this out to the general public.
This is the important part written in this section: "Above all, be honest with us. We are well aware that in many of life’s circumstances, especially those that involve marriage or other long term relationships that neither side is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes." meaning AVFM should have the applicants best interest in mind, and reserve judgement, but as you can see above it's all lies.
Just because Zac has a penis doesn't mean feminists will consider him guilty of child abuse. I need more proof than that. Preferably by qualified detective and our judicial system, not keyboard warriors on the internet.
I do not condone this type of harassment.
So much for representation. A voice for.... no, just no.
Friday 15 March 2013
For the second time today, Buntzums, your humble guide to all things.... well like you know, delves into yet another important topic.
Postpartum depression. It makes people feel low and it's temporary. It's a condition that happens after a woman delivers a child. Women have been know to do all sorts of unusual things during this time including killing their own children and others.
When I was reading comments from people one YouTuber kept insisting that these particular killings should be harshly punished because their effect is worse than rape and that this is something feminists should answer for because women don't talk about this.
Oh, but how wrong the user was in this. Women have been well aware of this for centuries. As one blogger wrote "There is no logic to this psychosis. The mother doesn't know right from wrong nor the consequences of her actions. She may feel that she is “saving” her child by killing him."
Balderdash the user said gnashing their great white teeth. To paraphrase, we in society are giving these women a free pass and treating them as children, why, if they were men we would be all ball and chain and crying for a head on a plate. This user then went on to describe feminists as not owning this or dealing with it.
Perhaps. Lets look at it more logically first.
Womyns groups such as the Canadian womens health network run support groups. I have personally seen the support shortly after a child is born to surround the mother to ensure she and the baby are well. Although it is still taboo to discuss mental illness women are aware, within feminist circles, and talk about how to deal with this issue.
It's likely not something men usually think about, because in this modern day we no longer hold to traditions and where once a woman would likely have been surrounded by a whole family of other women who would in essence watch her. In many cases she and the child are left on their own with the child most of the time as her husband braves the working world. This is a crucial part of a social structure: having the older members of the family help with the child rearing.
In modern times the midwife plays a role in supporting the new baby mama and child. A vital part of this supporting role includes keeping the new mother and child under observation during the early stages so she does not harm herself, the child or others. Preventing the mother from harming the child during this time, is not treating the mother like a child.
I likely, dear reader, don't need to state why a murder induced by postpartum depression is not the same as raping someone, but for those who still have doubts and think I'm just avoiding women taking responsibility for female crimes, or making men look bad, here goes:
Feminists both try and spread the word to other women about postpartum depression risks and provide services to support families suffering with this.
What else do womyns groups do? Well they try to educate the public about rape, as well as run support groups and services to do with rape relief. It's the positive enactment of change.
Here are some relevant links:
So to those who seek destruction, remember all ye angry dudes,
"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."
Buntzums first blog! Who's smarter? Men or Women? and does it even matter?
Hello, my little starry eyed readers!
This be the first of many a shining blog posts by Buntzums, the trolled. Started because every topic discussed on my YouTube channel ( http://www.youtube.com/user/Buntzums?feature=mhee ) get's side tracked and good, wholesome and true comments of merit are drown out but the din of frustration from a thousand howling and screeching horn dogs. Shouted down by mass confusion from the peanut gallery.
Here are the useful comments from a video ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GG_41Qjie-E ) titled 'Who's smarter? Men or women? and does it even matter?'
This be the first of many a shining blog posts by Buntzums, the trolled. Started because every topic discussed on my YouTube channel ( http://www.youtube.com/user/Buntzums?feature=mhee ) get's side tracked and good, wholesome and true comments of merit are drown out but the din of frustration from a thousand howling and screeching horn dogs. Shouted down by mass confusion from the peanut gallery.
Here are the useful comments from a video ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GG_41Qjie-E ) titled 'Who's smarter? Men or women? and does it even matter?'
- ·
·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
- ·
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)